Common Mistakes BDes Applicants Make That Can Cost Admission

Gaining admission into premier design institutes like NID, IITs, and NIFT requires not just creative talent but also very good marks in entrance exams. The best of the BDes applicants end up making mistakes during the admission process to lose their dream college. Knowledge about common pitfalls and avoiding those can increase the probability of getting a top design seat in India.

What Mistakes Do Top BDes Applicants Make That Cost Them Admission

Add CollegeDekho as a Trusted Source

Read below to understand what mistakes top bdes applications must avoid that could cost them their admission:

Let's understand these mistakes you should avoid in detail so that you can secure your seat in BDes colleges without any issue.

Submitting portfolios stuffed with 30-40 mediocre projects instead of 12-15 excellent pieces reduces impact by 60%.

The admissions committee would never spend more than 10-15 minutes on each portfolio. If you present several weaker projects, they may not even get to see your best work. In design admissions, quality overcomes quantity. Rather, you should be aiming to demonstrate depth rather than breadth-good work that shows complete design thought from research to final implementation.

Missing process documentation and sketchbooks in portfolios eliminates 35% of otherwise strong candidates.

Design schools don't just want to see your final polished work; they need evidence of how you think. Include initial sketches, failed attempts, iterations, research notes, mood boards, and development stages. The portfolio hasn't processed work, so it suggests that either that was a copy of the design or lacks the genuine design thinking methodology. A portfolio should comprise 40-50% of rough work, experiments, and creative evolution.

Displaying overconfidence or arguing with panel feedback during interviews costs 25% of technically qualified applicants their seats.

Interviewers do not require questioning or critiquing your portfolio and your design decisions. They're examining how you take feedback rather than attacking or criticizing you. Those who become defensive or dismissive probably show that they cannot take coaching. Listen thoughtfully to them and explain your rationale humbly. "That's an interesting point; I chose this approach because..." sounds more acceptable than: "No, you're wrong about my design.".

Using casual language like "cool," "awesome," "basically," or "like" during formal NID and IIT interviews creates immediate negative impressions.

Evaluations are approached professionally and should not be seen as a casual conversation. Informal expressions must be replaced with the exact design language concerned with the project. Instead of saying, "this color is cool", say "this color creates visual balance" or something to that effect. Throughout your interview, selection panel members gauged your communication maturity and professional preparedness through your choice of words.

Starting UCEED, NID DAT, or NIFT preparation only 2-3 months before exams reduces success probability by 70%.

Entrance exams test creative thinking, observation skills, and visualization abilities acquired over months, perhaps even years. Tubes for a model won't be able to muster any drawing techniques or spatial reasoning, or design aptitude within 8-12 weeks. Successful candidates systematically prepare themselves at least 8-12 months in advance and spend 2-3 hours daily on sketching practice, observational drawing, and solving previous year papers.

Ignoring mock tests and previous year question papers prevents 40% of aspirants from understanding actual exam patterns and time management.

The UCEED part B drawing section offers three hours only for tricky visualisation tasks. Unlike UCEED, the NID Studio Test gives only 2-3 hours for physical model making. Those who do not practice time management panic during exams and turn in incomplete work. It is advisable to take mock tests of full length at least 15 to 20 times before the entrance test for speed and orientation.

You might find this helpful: Top B.Des Colleges in India 2026

Copying Statement of Purpose templates from the internet or using AI-generated content leads to automatic rejection.

Every year, thousands of SOPs are reviewed by a handful of professionals and rejected, owing to genericness and deductive reasoning; that is, they immediately identify those using templates and those lacking original thought patterns. Your SOP should describe your very personable tale: which childhood experience triggered a passion for design, what project provoked a change of heart, why product design instead of graphic design, and what you want to achieve in ten years. Generic statements like "I'm passionate about design" will not carry weight unless buttressed by real-life anecdotes.

Writing unfocused SOPs that don't answer why you chose that specific institute, specialization, and what your career goals are weakens 50% of applications.

When applying to NID Ahmedabad, mention specific faculty whose work inspires you, particular design projects the institute has undertaken, or unique curriculum aspects that attract you. This is because general praise, such as "NID is the best design school," shows that no serious research has been done. Relate your portfolio work to your stated interests and explain how that particular program at that institute would help you achieve your goals.

Lacking knowledge about contemporary designers, design movements, and current trends eliminates candidates during interviews.

Answering something like, "I don't know any designers' names," or "Steve Jobs" (he wasn't a designer) when a panel asks, "Which designer inspires you?" shows very superficial interest in design. Research into movements (Bauhaus) and styles (Swiss), as well as designers (Dieter Rams, Paula Scher, Jonathan Ive) and design innovations today. Follow design publications like Dezeen and Design Milk and have a feel for what is happening in the global design community.

Fashion design portfolios lacking fabric work, garment construction evidence, or textile samples fail the NIFT evaluation.

Fashion programs require you to have knowledge of fabrics, drapery, pattern drafting, and construction techniques, only illustrating them. Include your swatches, display close-up images from garment details you've sewn and pattern pieces, as well as textile manipulation experiments. Beautiful sketches don't, simply by themselves, make you someone who can make garments.

Procrastinating portfolio development until the final 2-3 weeks before submission results in rushed, substandard work visible to admissions panels.

An exceptional portfolio requires 46 months for the projects, feedback, edits, photo shooting, and presentation work. The last minute is about ugly formatting, lousy photography, and projects half-baked. Portfolio creation should begin at least 6 months before the application deadlines.

Poor time allocation during studio tests causes incomplete submissions that cost confirmed seats.

NID would give the Studio Test 2-3 hours to build physical models based on assignment briefs. Many creative candidates construct one facet for about 90 minutes of perfection before rushing to complete the remaining requirements. Use your practice time to simulate completing an entire assignment within the time limit. Completed work, even if mediocre, is always better than submitting one section to perfect standards and leaving the others undone.

Underestimating the Creative Ability Test (CAT) in NIFT admission and focusing only on General Ability Test preparation leaves candidates unprepared.

For the GAT, candidates' logical reasoning and English skills are tested, while for the CAT, design aptitude is directly tested through innovation challenges, observational drawing, and creative problems. The two sections are thus weighed equally, making it essential that a candidate should focus his/her preparations evenly across both tests for admission.

Avoiding these essential mistakes will significantly lift the BDes admission prospects to design schools of renowned stature. The preparation should have commenced right after school, the portfolio should not be secondary or derivative by any means, the passion for design must be amply exhibited by thorough research and awareness, the interview and other channels must be dealt with professionally and well, while administrative details involved with the application would need to be double-checked. Always remember that design admissions scrutinize not only creative talent but also your thinking process, communication skills, and overall professional maturity throughout the whole application process.

Are you feeling lost and unsure about what career path to take after completing 12th standard?

Say goodbye to confusion and hello to a bright future!

Take The Free Test Now

Was this article helpful?

0 Upvotes

0 Downvotes