- COMEDK UGET 2026 Coordination Compounds Important Topics
- Important Portions from Coordination Compounds & Study Strategy
- COMEDK UGET 2026 Coordination Compounds Expected Weightage
- COMEDK UGET 2026 Coordination Compounds Practice Questions with Solutions
- Coordination Compound Question Mapping over Previous Years
- How to Prepare Important Portions of Coordination Compounds?

When you practice Coordination Compounds for COMEDK UGET 2026 , you are working on one of the most concept-driven and scoring chapters in Inorganic Chemistry. This chapter tests how well you understand the structure, bonding, and behaviour of metal–ligand complexes rather than simple memorisation. Through well-designed practice questions with solutions, you learn to connect theory with application—whether it is predicting geometry, identifying ligands, or analysing magnetic properties. Since COMEDK focuses on speed and accuracy, solving targeted questions from Coordination Compounds helps you quickly recognise patterns and standard problem types that frequently appear in the exam.
The most important portions of Coordination Compounds for COMEDK UGET include: nomenclature of coordination complexes, oxidation state and coordination number, types of ligands (mono-, bi-, ambidentate), isomerism (especially geometrical and optical), Werner’s theory, bonding theories (VBT and basic CFT), crystal field splitting in octahedral and tetrahedral complexes, magnetic moment calculations, and colour of complexes. In previous years, questions were repeatedly asked from IUPAC naming, identification of correct structural formulas, calculation of oxidation state of the central metal ion, prediction of number of unpaired electrons, and simple CFT-based questions comparing high-spin and low-spin complexes. The nature of questions is mostly direct to moderately conceptual—single-step MCQs that test clarity rather than lengthy calculations.
To prepare effectively for this chapter, you should first build strong conceptual clarity by understanding definitions and visualising structures instead of rote learning. Then, move to practice questions with step-by-step solutions, focusing on why an option is correct or incorrect. While practising, group questions topic-wise—nomenclature, isomerism, magnetism, and CFT—to identify your weak areas quickly. Revising previous-year COMEDK-style questions will help you understand the exam’s preference for straightforward logic-based problems. Finally, regular short revisions using formulas, common geometries, and standard complexes will ensure that Coordination Compounds becomes a high-confidence, high-scoring chapter for you in COMEDK UGET 2026.
Also Check - Do or Die Chapters for COMEDK UGET 2026 Chemistry
COMEDK UGET 2026 Coordination Compounds Important Topics
There are various topics that are included in the Coordination Compounds chapter, such as Structure and stereoisomerism, Werner’s theory, Bonding etc. If you are planning to sit for the exam, then you must make sure to be well-versed in all the topics properly. You can find the detailed list of COMEDK UGET 2026 Coordination Compounds sub-topics for exam preparation below:-
Chapter | Topics |
|---|---|
Coordination Compounds |
|
Also Check - COMEDK Chapter Wise PYQs for Chemistry
Important Portions from Coordination Compounds & Study Strategy
Check the important portions from the chapter.
| Portion / Topic | What You Must Know | How Questions Are Asked | How You Should Study (Smart Strategy) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Introduction & Basic Terminology | Coordination entity, central metal ion, ligand, coordination number, oxidation state | Direct definition-based MCQs, identify correct term | First, memorise definitions with examples. Then solve basic MCQs to build confidence. Do not skip this—it forms the base for all other topics. |
| Werner’s Theory | Primary valency, secondary valency, experimental proof | 1-step conceptual questions, match theory with compound | Understand logic instead of rote learning. Practice 5–10 standard problems repeatedly; questions are usually predictable. |
| Oxidation State of Metal Ion | Calculation rules, relation with ligands | Numerical + conceptual MCQs | Practice mixed questions daily. Always calculate oxidation state before solving geometry or magnetic questions. |
| Coordination Number & Geometry | CN = 2, 4, 6; linear, tetrahedral, square planar, octahedral | Identify geometry from formula | Create a small table of CN vs geometry and revise it daily. Solve visual-based MCQs. |
| Nomenclature of Coordination Compounds | IUPAC rules, naming ligands, metal ions, oxidation state | Direct naming or identify incorrect name | Memorise naming order + common ligands list. Practice at least 20 naming questions—this is a guaranteed scoring area. |
| Types of Ligands | Monodentate, bidentate, polydentate, ambidentate | Identify ligand type, count coordination number | Learn with examples (NH₃, CN⁻, en, NO₂⁻). Practice fast recognition questions to save time in exam. |
| Isomerism (Structural & Stereoisomerism) | Geometrical & optical isomerism (focus area) | Count number of isomers, identify type | Draw structures while studying. Focus mainly on square planar and octahedral complexes—these are frequently asked. |
| Valence Bond Theory (VBT) | Inner orbital vs outer orbital complexes | Conceptual MCQs | Understand hybridisation logic instead of memorising. Relate pairing of electrons with ligand strength. |
| Crystal Field Theory (CFT) | Δo, Δt, high-spin vs low-spin, CFSE (basic level) | Compare stability, spin state, colour | Focus only on octahedral and tetrahedral splitting. Avoid over-calculation; COMEDK asks simple conceptual questions. |
| Magnetic Properties | Paramagnetic vs diamagnetic, unpaired electrons | Numerical (spin-only formula) | Memorise formula √n(n+2). Practice quick calculation questions—very scoring and time-efficient. |
| Colour of Coordination Compounds | d–d transition, absorption of light | Conceptual questions | Understand the reason behind colour instead of wavelengths. One-time concept clarity is enough. |
| Stability of Complexes | Chelate effect, nature of ligand | Conceptual reasoning questions | Learn chelate effect with examples (EDTA, en). Usually asked as logic-based MCQs. |
| Previous Year Repeated Areas | Nomenclature, oxidation state, magnetism, isomerism | Direct repetition-based MCQs | Analyse previous COMEDK-level questions and revise these portions multiple times before the exam. |
COMEDK UGET 2026 Coordination Compounds Expected Weightage
As previously discussed, the Coordination Compounds chapter holds nearly 33% weightage in the COMEDK UGET 2026 Chemistry syllabus . While preparing, it is essential to have a clear understanding of both the expected weightage and the number of questions likely to be asked from this chapter. The table below provides a concise summary of the key details regarding the COMEDK UGET 2026 Coordination Compounds expected weightage.
Topic | Expected Number of Questions | Expected Weightage |
|---|---|---|
Coordination Compounds | 10-20 | 16-33% |
COMEDK UGET 2026 Coordination Compounds Practice Questions with Solutions
Consistently practicing COMEDK Coordination Compounds sample questions can greatly improve your exam preparation. COMEDK UGET 2026 Coordination Compounds practice questions with solutions helps you become familiar with possible exam questions, verify correct answers, and grasp step-by-step solutions effectively. Below are some important COMEDK UGET 2026 Coordination Compounds practice questions, carefully curated from past exam papers.
Q1. Which among the following is diamagnetic?
a) [Ni(CN)4] 2-
b) [CO(F6)] 3-
c) [NICL4] 2-
d) [Fe(CN)6] 3-
Correct answer - a) [Ni(CN)4] 2-
Solution: In [Ni(CN)4] 2- is strong field ligand and causes pairing of electrons.
Therefore, Ni2+ = 3d8
[Ni(CN) 4 ] 2-
Q2. The complex [PtCl 2 (en) 2 ] 2+ ion shows
a) structural isomerism
b) geometrical isomerism only
c) optical isomerism only
d) geometrical and ooptical isomerism
Correct answer - d) geometrical and ooptical isomerism
Solution: [PtCl 2 (en) 2 ] 2+ shows both geometrical and optical isomerism at the complex forms sis and trans isomers. Trans-isomer doesn’t show optical isomerism since it is symmetrical but cis-isomer shows optical isomerism as it is unsymmetrical.
Q3. Aqueous CuSO 4 changes colour from sky blue to deep blue on addition on NH3 because:
a) Cu 2+ forms hydrate
b) Cu 2+ changes to Cu +
c) [Cu(H 2 O) 4 ] 2+ + is labile complex and changes to [Cu(NH 3 ) 4 ] 2+ as NH3 is stronger ligand than H 2 O
d) Cu + changes to Cu 2+
Correct answer - c) [Cu(H 2 O) 4 ] 2+ is labile complex and changes to [Cu(NH 3 ) 4 ] 2+ as NH3 is stronger ligand than H 2 O
Solution: As H 2 O is a weak field ligand and thus [Cu(H 2 O) 4 ] 2+ absorbs red light in visible spectrum. But the colour appears blue because [Cu(H 2 O) 4 ] 2+ is a liblie complex and changes to [Cu(H 2 O) 4 ] 2+ , where NH3 is a strong field ligand thus absorbs yellow light of visible spectrum and impart blue oclour.
Q4. Identify the correct IUPAC name of [CoCl 2 (NO 2 )(NH 3 ) 3 ]
a) Triamminedichloridonitrito-N- cobalt (III)
b) Dichloridotriamminenitrito-O-cobaltate(II)
c) Dichlorotriamminenitrito- N - cobalt(OO)
d) Triamminedichloronitrito-O-cobaltate(III)
Correct answer - a) Triamminedichloridonitrito-N- cobalt (III)
Solution: The correct IUPAC name for the complex [CoCl2(NO2)(NH3)3] can be determined by following the rules for naming coordination compounds:
Ligands are named first in alphabetical order before the metal ion is named. Here, ammine (old spelling of amine recommended by IUPAC for naming complexes) comes before chloro and nitrito. Remember, nitrito can bind through the nitrogen (N) or through one of its oxygens (O), which will be specified as nitrito-N or nitrito-O,
The prefixes di-, tri-, etc., are used to indicate the number of each type of ligand in the complex, but these prefixes do not affect the alphabetical order.
The metal's oxidation state is indicated in parentheses using Roman numerals after the name of the metal.
If the complex is an anion, the suffix "-ate" is added to the name of the metal. However, since cobalt is not in anionic form here, we don’t add "-ate" to cobalt.
The charge of the complex can be determined for naming purposes, but it does not directly affect the choice among these options since they all refer to cobalt with Roman numerals to represent its oxidation state.
In this complex, cobalt (Co) is the central metal ion, and its oxidation state needs to be determined. Considering the ligands, we have two chloro (Cl - ) igands, one nitrito ligand that we need to establish is binding through nitrogen for certain options, and three ammine (NH 3 ) ligands.
To determine the oxidation state of Co, recall that NH3 is a neutral ligand, Cl - has a -1 charge each, making a total of -2 from the chlorides, and assuming nitrito as a monodentate ligand, it does not impact the calculation of the oxidation state as it's also considered to have a -1 charge when bound. The complex is neutral, so:
x+3(0) + 2 (-1) + (-1) = 0
X-3 = 0
So, cobalt is in the +3 oxidation state, making our choice among those mentioning cobalt(III).
The correct IUPAC name, therefore, comes from ordering the ligands alphabetically (ammine before chloro and nitrito), indicating the ligand count (triammine for three NH 3 , dichloro for two Cl - ), and specifying how nitrito is bound if specified how nitrito is bound if specified (nitrito-N or nitrito - )). Since none of the names mention the nitrito binding as O-bound and we don't have evidence from the provided formula to assume it binds through oxygen, the choice defaults to either directly listing nitrito or specifying as nitrito-N if such specification is given.
Considering all of the above, the correct option is:
Option A: Triamminedichloridonitrito-N- cobalt (III) because it follows the correct naming order, indicates the oxidation state accurately, and specifies the ligand connections correctly for a neutral complex.
Q5. Which one of the following Coordination entities exhibits Facial and Meridional isomerism?
a) [Co(H 2 O) 3 (NO 2 ) 3 ]
b) [CO(en) 2 Cl 2 ] +
c) [Co(NH 3 ) 4 Br 2 ]NO 3
d) [Co(en) 3 ]Cl 3
Correct answer - a) [Co(H 2 O) 3 (NO 2 ) 3 ]
Solution: The phenomenon of facial and meridional isomerism occurs in octahedral complexes with a general formula of the type MA 3 B 3 , where A and B are different sets of bidentate or monodentate ligands. This type of isomerism describes the distinct arrangement positions these ligands can adopt relative to each other in the geometry of the complex.
Facial (fac) isomerism occurs when the three identical ligands occupy adjacent positions at the corners of one face of the octahedron, forming a triangle. This can be thought of as the three A ligands or three B ligands clustering on the same face of the octahedral structure.
Meridional (mer) isomerism, on the other hand, is characterized by the arrangement where the three identical ligands lie along a meridian roughly forming a vertical band that includes the metal center. This isomer has the three A ligands or three B ligands spread out, each occupying a vertex of a plane that cuts through the center of the octahedron and divides it into two equal halves.
Examining the options provided:
Option A : [Co(H 2 O) 3 (NO 2 ) 3 ] is an octahedral complex where we have three molecules of water and three nitro groups as ligands. This type of complex has the general formula MA 3 B 3 and thus can exhibit both facial and meridional isomerism, making it a possible answer.
Option B : [CO(en) 2 Cl 2 ] + does not fit the required general formula MA 3 B 3 because it contains two ethylenediamine (en) ligands and two chloride ions. This complex is also more suitable to show geometrical isomerism (cis/trans).
Option C : [Co(NH 3 ) 4 Br 2 ]NO 3 does not fit MA 3 B 3 formula either, as it has four ammonia and two bromide ligands, making it suitable for other types of isomerism like cis-trans but not facial or meridional.
Option D : [Co(en) 3 ]Cl 3 does not fit the formulation criterion MA 3 B 3 , it is a complex with three identical chelate rings (triethylenediamine ligands), and symmetry precludes it from fac or mer isomerism.
Conclusion : Among the options, Option A [Co(H 2 O) 3 (NO 2 ) 3 ] is the only complex capable of exhibiting both facial and meridional isomerism due to its meeting the MA3B3 configuration criteria. The other options do not conform to this requirement and thus cannot exhibit these specific types of isomerism.
Coordination Compound Question Mapping over Previous Years
Check the type of questions asked from this topic.
| Topic | Frequency in COMEDK | Type of Questions Asked | Typical PYQ Pattern | How You Should Approach |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nomenclature of Coordination Compounds | Very High (almost every year) | Direct MCQs | Correct IUPAC name / incorrect name | Memorise naming rules + common ligands. Practice speed-based MCQs. |
| Oxidation State of Central Metal | Very High | Numerical + Conceptual | Find oxidation state in given complex | Always solve this first; it helps in geometry, magnetism & VBT questions. |
| Coordination Number & Geometry | High | Conceptual | Identify shape from formula | Memorise CN–geometry mapping (4 → square planar/tetrahedral). |
| Magnetic Properties | High | Numerical | Number of unpaired electrons / paramagnetism | Use spin-only formula; these are quick-scoring questions. |
| Isomerism (Mainly Geometrical) | Moderate–High | Structural reasoning | Count number of isomers | Focus on square planar & octahedral complexes only. |
| Types of Ligands | Moderate | Direct | Identify mono / bi / ambidentate ligand | Learn by examples; recognition-based questions. |
| Werner’s Theory | Moderate | Conceptual | Identify correct coordination entity | Revise experiments once; questions are predictable. |
| Valence Bond Theory (VBT) | Moderate | Conceptual | Inner vs outer orbital complex | Understand pairing concept; no deep theory required. |
| Crystal Field Theory (CFT) | Low–Moderate | Conceptual | High-spin vs low-spin | Only octahedral & tetrahedral splitting; avoid over-preparation. |
| Colour of Complexes | Low | Conceptual | Reason for colour | One-time concept clarity is sufficient. |
How to Prepare Important Portions of Coordination Compounds?
Check the below table on how you can prepare the portions that are important from coordination compounds.
| Focus Area | What You Should Do |
|---|---|
| Basics + Terminology | Definitions, coordination number, oxidation state |
| Werner’s Theory | Understand experiments + examples |
| Nomenclature (Part 1) | Naming ligands, order of naming |
| Nomenclature (Part 2) | Metal oxidation state & complex naming |
| Coordination Number & Geometry | CN vs shape mapping |
| Isomerism | Geometrical & optical isomerism |
| Valence Bond Theory | Inner vs outer orbital complexes |
| Crystal Field Theory | High-spin vs low-spin, splitting |
| Magnetic Properties | Spin-only formula, paramagnetism |
| Full Revision + PYQs | Mixed questions + error analysis |
We hope this article about COMEDK UGET 2026 Coordination Compounds Practice Questions with Solutions was helpful to you. For more such articles and information, stay tuned to CollegeDekho!














Similar Articles
COMEDK UGET 2026 Electrochemistry Practice Questions with Solutions
IIITs for 95 Percentile in JEE Main 2026
List of Colleges Expected for 35,000 Rank in JEE Main 2026
COMEDK UGET 2026 d and f Block Elements Practice Questions with Solutions
NITs for 99 Percentile in JEE Main 2025
NITs for 96 Percentile in JEE Main 2026