- What Are DI Sets with Missing Information?
- Key Challenges in Solving Missing-Data DI Sets
- Core Strategies to Tackle DI Sets with Missing Data
- Examples with Step-by-Step Solutions
- Extra Practice and Resource Recommendations
- What Are DI Sets with Missing Information?
- Key Challenges in Solving Missing-Data DI Sets
- Faqs

Data Interpretation and Logical Reasoning (DILR) section of the CAT sometimes presents sets with incomplete or inconsistent data, which can be challenging. These sets are meant to test your logical reasoning, not your plug-and-chug ability. For candidates, the frustrating part is normally "missing data." This document aims to assist you in developing a reasoned approach using logical reasoning, strategic set selection, and timing techniques.
What Are DI Sets with Missing Information?
DI sets with missing information are constructed to include gaps. Gaps compel candidates to reason instead of simply computing numeric information. Gaps can be represented as follows:
- Blank cells in a table
- Partial bar or pie chart values
- Totals or subtotals are not included
- Caselet variables are not reported
The focus isn't to fill in every blank, but to extract whatever the logic of the data allows to be solved. In CAT, while it is important to consider the time it takes to arrive at a "logical" answer, even with missing data, most question types have an answer.
Key Challenges in Solving Missing-Data DI Sets
- Formula methods fail when data is missing.
- Overdoing (or over-trying) to fill in lost data accounts for wasted time and reduced efficiency.
- The logic must replace direct computation—the candidates must be able to identify constraints, patterns, or relative relationships.
Core Strategies to Tackle DI Sets with Missing Data
First, highlight things that are known vs unknown.
- Keep track of totals, partial sums, or trends that connect data points.
Make groups of the set
- If working with a large table or chart, break it down into smaller groups.
- It is better to use analysis on one relationship at a time to prevent confusion.
Make logical ties and bounds
- Use totals, averages, or a ratio type analysis to deduce unknown values.
- For example, if you know three parts of a totality of a whole, you can deduce the last.
Use Variation Algorithms
- Sample unknowns as x, y, & z and set up the equations using these variables.
- Stick to the simplest equations—do not start making things complicated if you don't have to.
Eliminate Impossible Options
- In MCQ, just reject values that go against what you have been told.
- You do not need to fully determine an answer—you will actually avoid wasting time
Use Logic/Estimation
- If there is a set of answer choices that has a wide range, just make an approximation.
- You can use estimation whenever exact computation is not useful.
Control Your Time with Importance
- Solve questions whether or not the answer is obtained through straightforward logic.
- Do not require inference to solve, lick the question, and start the next: return if time allows.
Examples with Step-by-Step Solutions
Example 1: Table With Missing Information
Revenue (in INR) for a company for four months is presented in the following table:
Month Revenue
January- 120
February- 150
March- ?
April- 180
Question: What is the average revenue for the known months?
Solution: (120 + 150 + 180) ÷ 3 = 150 lakhs; the March figure is not needed.
________________________________________
Example 2: Pie Chart with Missing Sector
A pie chart provides information about the distribution of a company’s share of the market:
- A = 30%
- B = 25%
- C = 15%
- D =?
Question: What is the missing percentage?
Solution: Total = 100%. Known = 70%. Therefore, D = 30%.
Extra Practice and Resource Recommendations
To gain familiarity with some difficult sets, you can:
- Attempt to solve previous CAT papers, as they represent actual difficulty.
- Utilize practice platforms like CollegeDekho, iQuanta, Cracku, TIME, and IMS.
- Use the free DI sets you can find. Practice and exposure daily will help you become flexible and spot the patterns faster.
Missing-data DI sets in the CAT are tests of logic, not traps. If you are employing the correct CAT DILR strategy for logical reasoning, then YOU would ideally never waste your time on blanks and would focus on only solvable questions. Train yourself to find patterns instead of gaps - just this focus will improve both your accuracy and speed.
The Data Interpretation and Logical Reasoning (DILR) section of the CAT sometimes presents sets with incomplete or inconsistent data, which can be challenging. These sets are meant to test your logical reasoning, not your plug-and-chug ability. For candidates, the frustrating part is normally "missing data." This document aims to assist you in developing a reasoned approach using logical reasoning, strategic set selection, and timing techniques.
What Are DI Sets with Missing Information?
DI sets with missing information are constructed to include gaps. Gaps compel candidates to reason instead of simply computing numeric information. Gaps can be represented as follows:
- Blank cells in a table
- Partial bar or pie chart values
- Totals or subtotals are not included
- Caselet variables are not reported
The focus isn't to fill in every blank, but to extract whatever the logic of the data allows to be solved. In CAT, while it is important to consider the time it takes to arrive at a "logical" answer, even with missing data, most question types have an answer.
Key Challenges in Solving Missing-Data DI Sets
- Formula methods fail when data is missing.
- Overdoing (or over-trying) to fill in lost data accounts for wasted time and reduced efficiency.
- The logic must replace direct computation—the candidates must be able to identify constraints, patterns, or relative relationships.
Are you feeling lost and unsure about what career path to take after completing 12th standard?
Say goodbye to confusion and hello to a bright future!
FAQs
The best resources to practice tricky CAT DILR Logical Reasoning sets include solving previous year CAT DILR papers, which mirror real exam difficulty. Standard books like Arun Sharma’s How to Prepare for DILR, Nishit K. Sinha’s guide, and R.S. Aggarwal’s reasoning book are useful. Puzzle books, Sudoku, and logic grids also strengthen reasoning agility for CAT preparation.
Common Logical Reasoning sets in CAT include seating or arrangement puzzles (linear or circular), group distribution problems, networks and routes, games and tournaments, and hybrid sets combining DI with reasoning. Each set typically comes with 3–4 questions, testing logical deduction, constraint handling, and the ability to structure information methodically.
The best CAT DILR strategy for Logical Reasoning sets is smart set selection, using visual aids like tables or grids, solving straightforward questions first, and applying casework only when necessary. Time discipline is crucial—avoid getting stuck in one set. Regular mock analysis helps refine your approach and ensures efficiency during the actual CAT exam.
Logical Reasoning sets in CAT DILR are tricky because they involve multiple variables, overlapping conditions, and complex dependencies. Some questions use ambiguous conditionals, which are harder. Additionally, time pressure and the unpredictability of set types test not just knowledge but adaptability, logical reasoning, and decision-making skills under exam conditions.
To solve LR sets in CAT effectively, start by carefully reading all sets and selecting the ones that look familiar and solvable. Use diagrams or tables to represent conditions clearly, attempt direct questions first, apply elimination where needed, and manage time wisely by spending around 8–10 minutes per set.
Was this article helpful?


















Similar Articles
IIFT MBA Admissions 2026: Important Dates, Eligibility, Fees
Colleges for 90-100 Percentile in SNAP 2025
Total Seats in IIMs in 2025: Category-wise IIM Seats & Distribution
What Admissions Committees Look for in EMBA Candidates?
Common Executive MBA Application Questions and How to Answer Them
Is an Executive MBA More Valuable Than a Traditional MBA for Career Growth?