AILET Decision Making Practice Questions With Solutions

Registration Starts On August 07, 2025

Boost Your Prep with Free Practice Questions!

AILET Logical Reasoning Decision Making Practice Questions

Question 1.

img
A wildfire has broken out in a large national park, spreading quickly due to dry conditions and strong winds. The forest officers only have a limited amount of firefighting resources, including helicopters, water trucks, and personnel. They must decide where to allocate these resources to save as much of the park as possible. To maximize their efforts, they prioritise the areas of the park that are home to endangered species and ecosystems that would be the hardest to recover if destroyed by the fire. Which of the following most mirrors the principle in the passage above? I. A university offers a limited number of scholarships each year. To ensure the best use of its funds, it prioritizes applicants from underprivileged backgrounds and those with academic potential, believing this will have the most significant long-term impact on the community. II. A charitable foundation receives an influx of donations for disaster relief. In distributing the funds, it focuses on the hardest-hit communities where homes were completely destroyed, providing them with emergency shelter and rebuilding services before addressing other needs. III. A large grocery store faces a major food supply shortage due to transportation issues. To minimize the impact on customers, the store decides to limit the sale of high-demand items like milk, bread, and meat, allowing each shopper to purchase only a small amount to ensure everyone can get basic supplies. Select the correct option :

Question 2.

img
Where public safety or the protection of human life is at stake, it is justified to limit personal freedoms and privacy in order to ensure the well-being of the broader public. Based on the above principle, which of the following actions would be justified?

Question 3.

img
Principle: The impact of leadership styles on historical events can shape the course of nations and influence the outcomes of conflicts. Facts: During the late 20th century, two prominent leaders emerged during a territorial dispute: X advocated for peaceful negotiations and diplomacy, while Y supported aggressive military action to assert dominance. After a series of failed internal talks, Y’s approach led to a major conflict, resulting in significant casualties and territorial loss for both sides. In contrast, X’s proposed solution, although initially rejected, eventually gained support and led to de-escalation of the conflict. Based on the above, which of the following statements is most accurate?

Question 4.

img
Principle: A property owner is responsible for maintaining the safety of their premises and is liable for any injuries that occur due to hazardous conditions in the premises, unless the injured party was trespassing. Facts: Tara owns a retail store, and a heavy rainstorm caused a leak in the ceiling of the store. Tara was aware of the leak but did not have time to fix it before customers arrived the next morning. She placed a sign warning customers of the wet floor. However, Aman, who entered the store to browse, slipped on the wet floor and injured his leg. Aman did not see the warning sign. Based on the above which of the following statements is most accurate?

Question 5.

img
Principle: A party to a contract is responsible for fulfilling their obligations under the agreement and is liable for damages if they fail to do so. Facts: Richa enters into a contract with a catering company, Big Bites, to provide catering services for her wedding reception. The contract specifies that Big Bites will provide food for 125 guests on a specific date. On the day of the event, Big Bites only delivers food for 75 guests due to road closure on account of VIP movement. Richa is forced to make last-minute alternate arrangements to feed the additional guests, incurring extra costs. Select the most appropriate option :

Question 6.

img
Principle: A party who receives a benefit at the expense of another party is required to make restitution to prevent unjust enrichment. Facts: Anita hires a construction company, Best Builders, to renovate her swimming pool. The contract states that Best Builders will install new water purifiers for a total cost of INR 10,000. During the renovation, Best Builders installs high-end purifiers worth INR 15,000 instead of the standard ones specified in the contract. When the project is completed, Anita enjoys the upgraded purifiers but only pays the agreed-upon amount of INR 10,000. Select the most appropriate option :

Question 7.

img
Principle: The opportunity cost of a decision is the value of the next best alternative that is forgone when a choice is made. Facts: Shyam is an aspiring artist who has a chance to exhibit his paintings at a local gallery for two months. He can either take this opportunity, which would allow him to showcase his work and potentially sell pieces for a total profit of INR 50,000, or he can accept a temporary job offer for the same duration of two months, that would earn him INR 30,000 in total. After careful consideration, Shyam decides to exhibit his paintings at the gallery. Which of the following statements is true regarding Shyam’s decision?

Question 8.

img
Principle: Confirmation bias is the tendency to search for, interpret, and remember information in a way that confirms one’s pre-existing beliefs. Facts: Mala is an avid believer in the benefits of a plant-based diet and often shares articles and studies that support her view on social media. When she comes across a scientific study that suggests a balanced omnivorous diet can also provide significant health benefits, she dismisses it without reading, focusing instead on the findings of studies that align with her beliefs. Which of the following statements is true regarding Mala’s behaviour?

Question 9.

img
Principle: The Dunning-Kruger effect is a cognitive bias wherein individuals with low ability at a task overestimate their ability, while those with high ability may underestimate their competence. Facts: Tutu, a new employee at a tech company, recently completed a basic coding course. Feeling confident, she frequently shares her opinions about software development with her colleagues, often dismissing their suggestions as unnecessary. Meanwhile, Saba, a senior developer with years of experience, is careful about her own ideas and often second-guesses her suggestions during team meetings. Which of the following statements is true regarding Tutu and Saba’s behaviours?

Question 10.

img
Principle: Any person who publishes false statements that result in significant financial losses to a business shall be guilty of an offense. Facts: Jatin publishes a news article claiming that a popular restaurant has been serving unsafe food. Jatin sincerely believes this to be true. The restaurant suffers significant financial losses as a result. However, it is later revealed that the statements in Jatin’s article were false. Has Jatin committed an offence ?
Great Job! continue working on more practice questions?
InstructionThese instructions are applicable only to questions 1 to 1
Principle 1: Whoever enters into another person’s property with intent to intimidate, insult or annoy that person, commits “criminal trespass”. Principle 2: An act which causes harm which is so slight that no person of ordinary sense and temper would complain of such harm, is deemed not to amount to intimidation, insult or annoyance. Facts: X enters into Y’s property at midnight, uninvited, and points a gun at Y. A few minutes later, he reveals that the gun is a toy gun.

Question 1.

img
Choose the most appropriate answer:
InstructionThese instructions are applicable only to questions 2 to 2
Principle: Any person who knowingly disseminates false information with the intent to defraud shall be guilty of an offence. Facts: Dravid shares a news article containing false information about a popular cryptocurrency investment scheme. He claims it’s a groundbreaking opportunity. Many people invest and later lose money.

Question 2.

img
Is Dravid guilty of an offence?
InstructionThese instructions are applicable only to questions 3 to 3
Principle: Any individual who recklessly operates a motor vehicle, causing injury to another person, shall be guilty of an offense. Facts: Salman, while driving, becomes momentarily distracted and accidentally hits a pedestrian, causing minor injuries. Salman argues that it was a genuine accident and not reckless behaviour.

Question 3.

img
Is Salman guilty of an offense?
InstructionThese instructions are applicable only to questions 4 to 7
Consider the following principles and respond to the I. Principle 1: Vicarious liability is a doctrine holding one person strictly liable for the wrong of another, without regard to fault. II. Principle 2: An employer may be vicariously liable for the employee’s action if the employee’s act was an outgrowth of his employment, inherent in the working environment, typical of or broadly incidental to the employer’s business, or, in a general way, f oreseeable from his duties. III. Principle 3: No vicarious liability on employers for the intentional wrongs by employees unless the employee’s actions were done, at least in part, to serve the interest of the employer.

Question 4.

img
Which of the following will NOT result in vicarious liability?

Question 5.

img
Which of the following may result in vicarious liability?

Question 6.

img
An unknown person knocks down a few hundred jars of baby food in the supermarket. Many of the jars shattered, making a big, slippery mess on the floor. Laila, the supermarket manager, closes down the aisle with bright orange cones and orders all available stock personnel to clean the mess. Arun, who is not paying attention while shopping in the supermarket, wanders past the orange cones, slips, and breaks his arm. Is the supermarket vicariously liable?

Question 7.

img
Phogat works as a bouncer at the Hot Spot, a local nightclub. One night Dash arrives outside the Hot Spot with a group of his friends. Dash is intoxicated and acting obnoxiously, hooting at the women going in and out of the club. Dash’s behaviour annoys Ph ogat, who asked Dash twice to stop acting in this way, but Dash ignored him on both occasions. Phogat then punches Dash in the face, breaking his nose. Dash sues the Hot Spot and Phogat, claiming that the Hot Spot is vicariously liable. Is the Hot Spo t vicariously liable for the actions of Phogat?
InstructionThese instructions are applicable only to questions 8 to 8
In a dispute between Anil and Sunil, Sunil can sue Anil in: I. the city where the dispute arose, OR II. in the city of Anil’s place of business Facts: Anil and Sunil enter into a contract for delivery of specialised machinery. Anil was to deliver the machinery to Sunil’s warehouse within a stipulated period of time. Anil’s residence is in Delhi, but his place of business is Bengaluru, whereas Suni l is a resident of Mumbai. Anil fails to deliver the machinery during the agreed time.

Question 8.

img
Where can Sunil sue Anil?

Question 9.

img
‘X’ and ‘Y’, enter into a contract (i.e. X and Y are parties to the contract) for supply of goods by X to Y in exchange for payment from Y to X. Consider the following Clause in the contract: (Sub-Clause 1) Neither party shall be held liable for failure to comply with its obligations under this contract if such failure is due to any kind of natural disaster or human event beyond its control. (Sub-Clause 2) The successful invocation of this Clause by either party shall protect that party from liability for non -fulfilment of its obligations under the contract only until the natural disaster or human event in Sub -Clause 1 continues to affect that party.” The contract requires X to deliver goods from his house to Y’s house latest by 30th May. Both X and Y live in the same city. On the morning of 30th May, there is a big earthquake near X’s house which causes all roads in the area to be blocked. The blockage remains present until 31st May. Can X claim that this situation falls under Sub -Clause 1?

Question 10.

img
Consider the following principle : In a dispute between X and Y, Y can sue X : (i) In the city of X’s residence, OR (ii) In the city where the dispute arose X and Y enter into a contract which requires X to deliver goods from his house to Y’s house latest by 30th May. X lives in Delhi and Y lives in Calcutta. X fails to deliver the goods by 30th May due to an earthquake in Delhi. Y wants to sue X for breach of the contract. Y can sue X :
Great Job! continue working on more practice questions?

Other Topics of that Section

  • Analytical Reasoning Practice Test Questions with Solutionsimg Attempt Now
  • Critical Reasoning Practice Test Questions with Solutionsimg Attempt Now
  • Logical Deductions Practice Test Questions with Solutionsimg Attempt Now
  • Puzzles Practice Test Questions with Solutionsimg Attempt Now
  • Statement and Assumption Practice Test Questions with Solutionsimg Attempt Now
  • Statements and Conclusion Practice Test Questions with Solutionsimg Attempt Now
  • Syllogisms Practice Test Questions with Solutionsimg Attempt Now
  • Statements and Arguments Practice Test Questions with Solutionsimg Attempt Now
  • Directions, Number and Letter Series Practice Test Questions with Solutionsimg Attempt Now
  • Series Completion Practice Test Questions with Solutionsimg Attempt Now
  • Data Interpretation Practice Test Questions with Solutionsimg Attempt Now
  • Seating Arrangements (Linear & Circular) Practice Test Questions with Solutionsimg Attempt Now
  • Blood Relations Practice Test Questions with Solutionsimg Attempt Now
  • Coding-Decoding Practice Test Questions with Solutionsimg Attempt Now
  • Course of Action Practice Test Questions with Solutionsimg Attempt Now

Want to know more about AILET

Still have questions about AILET ? Ask us.

  • Typical response between 24-48 hours

  • Get personalized response

  • Free of Cost

  • Access to community

Top